“Take it or leave it” is not negotiation but coercion
“Take it or leave it” is not negotiation but coercion.
Physicians have been subject to this tactic for much too long. As an ophthalmologist in clinical practice for nearly four decades, I experienced too often what a recent author on KevinMD described as a one-sided arrangement with a health insurance company. “Here is the fee schedule. Here is the document to sign.” End of story.
If you object to the terms of the contract and attempt to negotiate better terms, you are excluded from the insurance company’s network. I recall an episode of such coercion when the medical director of a large insurance company met with our group of physician-partners to propose that we open an optical shop within the confines of his multispecialty clinic. Our group hired personnel, purchased inventory, and managed the operation, while the health insurance company would take a substantial cut of the revenue. Declining this one-sided offer came with the threat of losing patient referrals for eye care.
Such heavy-handed tactics have been successful for health insurance companies and hospital systems because of their size and reach. The choice for independent physicians: either accept an adverse offer or be excluded from the network. Many doctors have thrown up their hands and become employees of a system that regards them as cogs in the machine, if only to dispense with the battle for better terms. The consequence of giving in to coercion is that it never ends unless you exit that system.
